The “Tech Day”

I am lucky to work at a school that values professional development and actually offers 10 days of paid PD before school starts. As a team lead, I often run many of the PD sessions for new and returning teachers. This year one of my tasks was to co-facilitate the “tech day” for new staff. Our staff needed to leave the day  with the following objectives having been met:

  • How to use, at least a basic level, Google Docs, Google Calendar, Google Forms, Google Slides, and Google Drive (since as a staff we use GAfE for everything)
  • How to create a website and newsletter

But as we knew that we had to make the day more than just a tech day–that we needed to model that tech was a tool to be used in the classroom but that it was not the end point. So we decided to reframe the day as a day focused on building communication and collaboration skills. Our objectives became

  • How to use technology (including GAfE Tools, a website, a newsletter) to communicate and collaborate with others
  • To have fun
  • To build a community
  • to practice a growth/risk-taking mindset

We started the day off with a stoke activity called Long Lost Friend–to boost energy and to nurture camaraderie. This activity provided an opportunity for everyone to mingle and to create shared experiences with multiple partners. They greeted each other as long-lost friends, as if the person you are greeting just told you won the lottery, as if the person just told you that they ran into your ran, and as if they were your 80 year old grandmother. Lots of laughter and ridiculousness ensued. A quick debrief on the purpose of the activity and a tone was set that today was going to be fun and funny but also might ask you to step outside of your comfort zone to try something new and crazy but that we were all going to travel this journey together.

Continuing with the focus on building a community and starting a conversation about collaborating and communicating, we moved into the handy spaghetti/marshmallow challenge (thanks to my Google Certified Teacher Academy, #mtv14)– asking the new teachers to work in small groups to see which could build the highest tower using just the materials provided. Once everyone finished their tower (or didn’t-depending on the success of the tower), we debriefed the activity–what worked well and what didn’t work so well? How did the team work together? What was each member’s communication style? How did working as a team help (or hinder) the team?

The next activity, an Amazing Race Activity (another shout out to my GTAMTV#14) asked the new staff to work in teams and to work with GAfE tools to solve challenges about the school and to think about communication. To create the activity, I create a series of tasks for the participates to complete using GAfE tools. Once they completed a task, they entered a URL into a google form to get the next Google Map location and the next clue. And then entered the next URL for the next completed task into another form to get the next clue. Each location was significant and so the participants learned about the school while completing the tasks and learning about the tech tools. Some of the tasks asked them to brainstorm about communication such as Newsletter Dos and Don’ts

Screen Shot 2016-01-18 at 5.44.25 PM.png

First Clue

Team members who knew more about the different tech tools helped those with less knowledge with prizes given out to the winning team (and to the team who went above and beyond). Again, we debriefed the activity, focusing this time not just on collaboration and communication but also on how the activity could be used in their classroom and the difference of learning technology through a project than just learning a tool for the tool’s sake. Participants also shared stories on how the different GAfE tools could be used for other purposes–forms to collect classroom information, Google sites to share information, etc.

To share out information that the teams had included on their slide decks about communication, we modeled how to create a Google doc and how to share it with others via email and asked everyone to go to their gmail and to open the doc. Groups then shared out and posted some of their ideas to the shared doc. This allowed us to talk about communication dos and don’ts without having to talk at the participants while giving them opportunities to learn how to use the tech tools we use to communicate with students, parents, and each other.

Next up was website design. We had already discussed how to use tech (including websites) in the earlier activity and so quickly shared out different examples of teacher’s websites–pointing out examples of good communication. Teachers can use a variety of options to create their websites so we talked about the options and the teachers regrouped into groups using similar website programs (including Weebly, Wix, Google Site, and Blogger) to help each other with the tech. In addition, I created a series of help videos on “how to” on using Google Sites and Weebly as website platforms so that there was “just in time” PD around creating a website. Everyone worked together, sharing tips and ideas; again collaborating with each other to create a better learning experience for everyone.

All in all it was a successful day of professional development–our new staff learned how to use a variety of tech tools to communicate while using the tools themselves to collaborate with their new colleagues. They had fun, laughed a lot, and learned.

Advertisements
Posted in Professional Development, Teaching, Technology | Leave a comment

Learning Spaces: #yourEdustory Week 9

Clearly a bit behind on my #youredustory blog postings–it is week 9, and my last post was week 2. Ooops.

This week’s posting is about space and design–well, it’s to put together a design brief for a new learning environment. Instead of writing a design brief, I am going to ramble about space 🙂

Space and its impact on my teaching has always been a concern of mine–ever since my first year teaching some 16 years ago. I remember walking into my new classroom–I was a brand new teacher, not even fully credentialed–and thinking, wow, this is small! And it was small. With 20 desks, one small round table, two book shelves, and a teacher’s desk (I didn’t know enough to get rid of it though I did stuff it in the corner), you could barely walk through the room. If the students were in the room and had their backpacks and coats hung on the chairs, you couldn’t walk through the room without knocking over someone’s backpack. I taught second grade, and there wasn’t enough room for a reading area–not even an area for the students to sit and listen for “rug time.” I had my students move their desks when we were on the rug and move them back when they needed to sit at their seats. The lack of space made for some interesting behavior issues–I couldn’t separate students; everyone was practically touching elbows.

The one good thing about that space was that I had a connecting door inside my classroom to the next classroom. The teacher next-door, another new teacher, and I would often prop the door open during the day. She also had a small room but had a third door out the back. We would spread students out between the two rooms and outside, using the door in-between to keep an eye on students in the other room.

The next year, I was a second year teacher, which meant that I could get a bigger room. I moved into a room where the desks fit and you could walk around them without hitting a backpack. There was built-in storage and sink with drinking fountain (which my last room hadn’t had). I could have a reading area and a rug area that was permanent. Honestly, the biggest benefit of the space was that students could spread out. They could read and work in many different places and didn’t hit elbows while working. It was fabulous.

Later, I measured my first room since they were looking to turn a room into a computer lab. After looking at the measurements, the IT guy mentioned that it was legally too small for a classroom. He suggested that my room and the room next to it had been one room before California had enacted class size reduction; hence the door between, the small sizes, and the lack of outlets on the wall between.

My more recent rooms have been bigger and more standard (since they are portables). I have come to value the flexibility portables have–I can make the room into whatever I want. A couple of years ago, I started to collect extra white boards (both ones on the wall and moveable ones), seeing the value of students being able to work anywhere they want. The more flexible I made the room, the more the 8th graders utilized it–creating workspaces that met their needs. Being in school should not be uncomfortable and a good work space is conducive to working. I am always amazed how much students enjoy using a white board and something about being able to erase seems to encourage brainstorming.

My ideal space would involve flexible furniture with different seating options. Students would be able access white boards that they could continue to use for long term projects. There would be storage space for student projects.  If money were no issue, this is what I want (Stanford d school-inspired):

Screen Shot 2015-03-01 at 8.10.57 PM

I have been collecting fun furniture and learning space images as inspiration for my students when they do their “design a school of the future” intersession. It is amazing what some schools and businesses have in terms of flexible and comfortable spaces–https://www.pinterest.com/jessicalura/school-of-future-intersession/ .

Do you need to have an innovative space to be innovative? Probably not but I am sure that it can’t hurt.

Posted in Design Thinking | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Scaffolding Student Making

Yesterday, I attended Day 3 of Stanford’s K-12 Lab 2014-2015 Home Team d thinking arc. The day was focused on exploring mindsets and design thinking in the classroom. Based on our interests, we rotated through a series of activities though always focusing on three d thinking mindsets–recognizing more than one POV (point of view), having a bias toward action, and seeing constraints as opportunities.

My first session was a design thinking STEM activity where we were challenged to build a grabber– Galileo-style (as in Camp Galileo, a very popular and innovative camp that uses d thinking in its activities). Because of time constraints, the activity focused on the ideate, prototype, and test portions of the design process (though they created a frame of needing the grabber because the user was too short to reach items).

IMG_8498What intrigued me about the activity was that we all started by making the same basic simple machine (with a hinge and lever)–a Do-With-Me strategy– and then modified the machine to meet the challenge (of picking up three items–a sponge, a plastic solo cup, and a small dowel).

The simple machine we started with didn’t meet the challenge, but scaffolded students’ (especially first and second graders) understanding in a way so that they can truly focus on innovation (rather than producing crap that sort of works). The machine in the picture was a “standard-base” so that we were all able to build something that worked.

In addition, the facilitators spend time rapidly prototyping live–the whole group generated ideas that were quickly tried out by the facilitator so that students’ minds were opened to the different possibilities and so that it was clear to all the expectation was collaboration and sharing, not competition. As we worked, the facilitators also stopped for group sharing so that we intentionally reflected mid-build, which helped spur redesign and helped groups that were struggling.

I struggle with how much to scaffold student making– too much and it isn’t their project, too little and some students are unable to complete the project. By providing a standard base, young students can complete this challenge and learn more about simple machines (and levels and hinges) than if they were asked to start from scratch.

IMG_8499Our completed project–we were able to pick up all three objects and pick up a sharpie and write (poorly) on a piece of paper. Poor Jenny–I was a fan of the minimalist style for this project so ours didn’t look at cool as some of the other projects.

Posted in Design Thinking, Making | Tagged , , | Leave a comment